鲍鱼视频

  • Locations

Understanding the Risks: Stem Cell Eye Treatment Controversies

Recent controversies highlight the significant聽risks of unproven stem cell eye treatments. This page explains a notable case and underscores why choosing FDA-approved clinical research and qualified specialists is crucial for your vision safety.

The Florida Case: A Warning About Stem Cell Eye Treatment Risks

In 2017, The New England Journal of Medicine reported that three women in Florida suffered permanent vision loss after receiving unproven stem cell injections for macular degeneration at a private clinic. This case exposes critical gaps in patient protection and the dangers of clinics operating outside rigorous clinical trials.

Key Takeaway: Stem cell eye treatment risks are real. Patients paid $5,000 each for a procedure that lacked FDA oversight and scientific validation, leading to blindness.

By 
MARCH 15, 2017

Warning about stem cell eye treatment risks and patient safety
The left eye of a patient showing hemorrhages 13 days after stem-cell injection.
Credit: Dr. Thomas Albini

Three women suffered severe, permanent eye damage after  were injected into their eyes, in an unproven treatment at a loosely regulated clinic in Florida, doctors reported in an article published Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine.

One, 72, went completely blind from the injections, and the others, 78 and 88, lost much of their eyesight. Before the procedure, all had some visual impairment but could see well enough to drive.

What Went Wrong?

  • Procedure:聽The clinic used liposuction to extract stem cells from the patients’ fat, then injected them into both eyes simultaneously.
  • Result:聽Patients experienced detached retinas and high eye pressure. One woman went completely blind.
  • Regulation Gap:聽The clinic argued that using a patient’s own cells exempted it from FDA drug regulations.

All three women found U.S. Stem Cell because it  on a government website,  鈥 provided by the . Two later told doctors they thought they were participating in government-approved research. But no study ever took place, and the proposed study on the site had no government endorsement. Clinical trials do not need government approval to be listed on the website.

Legitimate research rarely, if ever, charges patients to participate, scientists say, so the fees should have been a red flag. But many people do not know that.

Warning about stem cell eye treatment risks and patient safety
Sawgrass Medical Center, where U.S. Stem Cell operates its clinic in Sunrise, Fla.
Credit: Scott McIntyre for The New York Times

Stem cells, which can develop into many different types of cells, are thought to have tremendous potential to repair or replace tissue damaged by disease, injury or aging. But so far, the F.D.A. has approved only a few stem-cell products to treat certain blood disorders.

Warning about stem cell eye treatment risks and patient safety
Stem cells from fat tissue. Staff members at U.S. Stem Cell used liposuction to take fat out of three women鈥檚 bellies, and then extracted stem cells from the fat to inject into the women鈥檚 eyes.
Credit: Riccardo Cassiani-Ingoni/Science Source

Red Flags and How to Protect Yourself

This case reveals several warning signs for patients considering experimental stem cell therapies:

  1. Charging for Experimental Treatment:聽Legitimate clinical research rarely charges participants.
  2. Treating Both Eyes at Once:聽Ethical research treats one eye first to preserve vision if complications occur.
  3. Misleading Trial Listings:聽The clinic listed a “study” on a government website (),聽which does not imply endorsement or approval.

Expert Insight from the FDA

In an accompanying article, FDA scientists warned that stem cells from fat聽“are being used in practice on the basis of minimal clinical evidence of safety or efficacy.”

The F.D.A. website warns 鈥渢he hope that patients have for cures not yet available may leave them vulnerable to unscrupulous providers of stem-cell treatments that are illegal and potentially harmful.鈥

The F.D.A. article in The New England Journal of Medicine suggested that adverse events from stem-cell treatments 鈥渁re probably much more common than is appreciated, because there is no reporting requirement when these therapies are administered outside clinical investigations.鈥

The Importance of FDA-Approved Research

奥丑颈濒别听stem cell research for eye diseases聽holds great promise, progress must happen through controlled, ethical clinical trials. The FDA has approved only a few stem-cell products, primarily for blood disorders鈥攏ot for intraocular use.

Choosing Safe, Ethical Eye Care

Your vision is irreplaceable. We strongly advise:

  • Consulting a board-certified ophthalmologist聽before considering any experimental treatment.
  • Verifying FDA approval status聽for any procedure or clinical trial.
  • Being skeptical of “miracle cures”聽that bypass established medical channels.

Trustworthy Resources on Stem Cell Research

Read the Original NY Times Report:

FDA Consumer Warning:聽FDA Warns About Stem Cell Therapies

Schedule a Consultation for Evidence-Based Care

If you or a loved one are exploring treatment options for macular degeneration or other eye conditions, our physicians can provide guidance on safe, effective, and scientifically validated pathways.

馃搮 Book a Consultation with Our Specialists